Buckeye Agricultural Radio Network | BARN | Ag Radio
    About Us   Blogs   News   BARN TV   Audio   Calendar   Stations   Contact Us   Home
Agriculture news and rural lifestyle

Pages: << 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 28 >>

10/06/08

Permalink 01:32:44 pm, by Lindsay Email , 75 words   English (US)
Categories: Lindsay's Daily Lesson

The New BuckeyeAg.com

Over the past couple of weeks, no doubt you've noticed some changes to our web site. Our redesign is now complete meaning that we can offer more news, more audio and more video than ever before.

Last week, during World Dairy Expo, our friend and acclaimed farm podcaster Chuck Zimmerman caught up with me for an interview to discuss the changes. My thanks to Chuck for his continued interest in what's happening in the BARN.

10/02/08

Permalink 03:23:49 pm, by Lindsay Email , 402 words   English (US)
Categories: Lindsay's Daily Lesson

PETA Messes With Ice Cream - It's time to draw the line

Just when I thought the radical activist group PETA had crossed out of every boundary of human sanity possible, they have once again proven that lunacy knows no bounds.

PETA has sent a letter to ice cream maker Ben & Jerry's asking them to replace milk from dairy cows with human breast milk in all of their products. Since the benefits of using breast milk in ice cream may not be obvious to those of us who are in our right minds, please allow me to explain.

PETA officials say a move to human breast milk would lessen the suffering of dairy cows and their babies on factory farms and benefit human health. In a letter to the co-owners of Ben & Jerry's they said -

"The fact that human adults consume huge quantities of dairy products made from milk that was meant for a baby cow just doesn't make sense," says PETA Executive Vice President Tracy Reiman. "Everyone knows that 'the breast is best,' so Ben & Jerry's could do consumers and cows a big favor by making the switch to breast milk."

I'm not certain the economics of sourcing breast milk for ice cream production, nor am I certain of what they propose in terms of meeting supply and demand, but let's hope we never have to find out.

Putting the fact that the idea is totally ridiculous aside, it seems that PETA is once again exploiting women in a way that is unfavorable and degrading. I find it interesting that thousands of women who would proclaim themselves to be equal with men continue to open their pocketbooks to PETA in support of such antics. This attempt at leveling the playing field between bovines and women is just the latest in a series of things PETA has done that are disrespectful to females.

For example, the infamous "I'd rather go naked than wear fur campaign," has exploited numerous females who have stripped down to make a statement. And, PETA is also known for staging rallies and other events where an unclothed woman will sit in a cage in protest of cruelty to animals.

I find most of what PETA does to be abhorrent, but their methods of demeaning women to further their agenda of advancing animals to the point of equality with humans is sickening. At what point will people come to their senses and stop funding this nonsense?

10/01/08

Permalink 04:07:12 pm, by Lindsay Email , 506 words   English (US)
Categories: Lindsay's Daily Lesson

Posilac Acquisition Complete - Does it mean anything?

A few months ago when Elanco announced their intentions to purchase Posilac, I found myself scratching my head wondering why the company would be interested in making such a purchase given the relative worthlessness of the product in Ohio given the new rBST requirements. Today, during World Dairy Expo, I had the opportunity to visit with folks from Monsanto's Dairy Division to learn more about the situation.

While Ohio has been one of the most stringent states in the nation on rBST labeling requirements, the perspective outside of our state is much different with demand for milk containing rBST remaining almost steady. While there are relatively few retail outlets for milk containing rBST here in the state, that's not necessarily the case elsewhere.

This begs the question, how do you market a product that has been attacked by activist groups and a small segment of the consumer population who demand dairy products that are free of artificial growth hormones? The answer - turn the tables. The Posilac display at World Dairy Expo doesn't hype the benefits of rBST in terms of increased production and the residual increase in a dairy farmers bottom line. The display hypes the fact that Posilac helps to reduce the carbon footprint. An excerpt from their web site says -

POSILAC’s impact alone can lower the carbon footprint of a gallon of milk by 9 percent.

Research shows that for every 1 million dairy cows supplemented annually with POSILAC, fewer resources are required and waste is reduced. This is compared to making the same amount of milk without the technology.

This new positioning to appeal to environmentalists could really give them cause to pause. For example, if you're Wal-Mart, and you've made public your intents to be as green as possible, then how can you say no to the use of rBST when you know that it will result in a reduced carbon footprint?

I have continually maintained that the organic sector of producers shot themselves in the foot when they started attacking the use of rBST in an effort to promote their own practices. Their attacks worked, but unfortunately they worked a bit too well. A few activist groups believed them, flooded the phone lines of retail outlets saying that consumers demand products free of artificial hormones, and before they knew it retailers decided to stop offering products that contained rBST. This forced dairy producers to stop using the technology because of a lack of outlets for the milk. And the end result for organic producers is that they lost a major point of difference from other producers, thus making their "premium" products rather ordinary by comparison.

This being said, I give the makers of Posilac kudos for keeping up the fight and recognizing that if you can't appeal to people's good sense in providing them with science-based information indicating that milk produced using rBST is no less safe than milk produced without the artificial hormone, then fight back with the same emotional appeal that allowed the activists to win round one.

08/19/08

Permalink 04:49:35 pm, by Lindsay Email , 1027 words   English (US)
Categories: Lindsay's Daily Lesson

Forever Green

As the ABN County Fair and Festival Tour powered by Propane rolls on this summer, it gives us a chance to meet many people across the state and interact with them about a variety of topics. Of course, it's always fun to see our young 4-H members exhibiting their projects and the smiles on their faces as they tell us about their hard work and success.

This year, it has been particularly interesting to witness a growing number of new projects in the 4-H arena that seem to be gaining popularity. Examples of these opportunities include rockets, robots, finance, nutrition and even unique projects made with duct tape that stretch the limits of the imagination. No doubt this expansion of 4-H has allowed young people who might not otherwise be able to participate in the organization through some of the more traditional projects such as livestock, to enjoy that same valuable experience.

When used as a vehicle to increase membership, awareness and access to 4-H, I fully support these projects. Moreover, I see them as a valuable opportunity to expose young people from outside the rural community to agriculture. While living in a city, or not coming from a farm background may limit a young person's ability to bring cattle to the county fair, our ability to use 4-H to reach out to those students who are building rockets and robots and help them to understand the value of agriculture is boundless.

Some of you may question the direct connection between these non-traditional projects and the need to use them as a conduit back to agriculture. The reasons for doing so are many. First of all, to be an active member in any organization it is important to understand the roots of that organization. It just so happens that 4-H was started right here in Ohio by A.B. Graham, and at that time it was known as the Agricultural Boys and Girls Club. The projects that those young people worked on were centered around agriculture and rural lifestyles. Thus, it is extremely important that we never forget where we came from, and it was agriculture that gave life to the organization we now know as 4-H.

Keeping in mind that the production of food, fuel and fiber impacts every American, it is vitally important that we help our young people develop a basic understanding of production agriculture and ensure that they are well-versed about where those products come from. What better organization to do that than one that was founded for that very purpose?

Part of the reason I bring this up is that as we've been visiting with folks across the state we have heard some rather alarming comments. When visiting with one particular 4-H Extension Educator about the changes we've seen in 4-H and the much broader range of project opportunities, I posed the question of how in their role as 4-H Extension Educatators they are able to still make agriculture relevant to young people who exhibit non-traditional projects. The response that I received was, "Wow, I never thought of that."

In yet another conversation, someone went so far as to say that FFA is for ag kids and 4-H is for everyone else. When pressed for further explanation of that comment the person said that 4-H is still there for the ag kids, but ultimately they will join FFA when they become old enough, so it's simply an intermediary organization relative to agriculture.

This particular comment really struck me because despite the connection I now have with FFA and the work I do in support of the organization, I was never a member of the FFA. Due to scheduling conflicts in high school, I had to make a choice between college prep classes and agriculture classes and knowing that I was headed off to college, I opted out of FFA. However, I exhibited livestock projects through 4-H throughout my years of eligibility and I treasure that experience. Not every school offers an FFA program, is able to accommodate all who may be interested in ag classes or is able to offer enough resources to their students that FFA should be seen as a suitable replacement for 4-H.

Along the same lines of thinking, someone made an observation that 4-H is yielding agriculture to the FFA in lieu of focusing on a different niche. While I understand that this is simply the opinion of a casual observer, I had to wonder what is happening in the 4-H program that it might even give off the perception that this is the case.

Earlier this year we dedicated a beautiful new building for Ohio 4-H. That building became a reality because of thousands of donors who shared in a vision, are passionate about 4-H and want to see it continue as a strong and vital organization. And many of those dollars were generated from businesses and individuals who represent agriculture.

There is an old adage to the effect that "you need to dance with the one that brought you." In the case of 4-H, it was the Agricultural Boys and Girls Club that gave birth to the organization. We must never forget that while 4-H is about more than living on the farm and bringing animals to the county fair, it will forever be rooted in agriculture. That being said, we must never turn our backs on that piece of the organization's heritage.

Further, we as past members of 4-H we have a responsibility to support the continued growth of the organization, while at the same time holding our local, county and state leaders accountable for the direction and mission of the organization. 4-H is arguably the most powerful connection that we in agriculture have to influence our young people who are not yet involved in FFA, or not able to be be involved in other agricultural youth organizations. We must never forget the value of that connection and do all that we can to ensure that it remains strong and vital, particularly as we move toward a future of young people who are generations removed from the family farm, or have no exposure to agriculture.

07/18/08

Permalink 07:28:46 am, by Lindsay Email , 142 words   English (US)
Categories: Lindsay's Daily Lesson

We may need a wider jersey

It would appear that the OSU Men's basketball team's latest recruit may have to wrap his last name around his jersey.

The Columbus Dispatch reports:

Zisis Sarikopoulos, a 7-foot, 265-pound center from Athens, Greece, is transferring to Ohio State from the University of Alabama-Birmingham, OSU coach Thad Matta said yesterday.

Sarikopoulos will sit out the 2008-09 season and will have three seasons of eligibility. He appeared in 20 games, starting four, last season and averaged 1.8 points and 1.1 rebounds for the Blazers (23-11).

I have to admit that I'm scratching my head on this one. He's 7 feet tall and averaged 1 point and 1 rebound, only starting in four games. Why wasn't he good enough to start, and if he's seven feet tall, shouldn't he be able to get some rebounds? Maybe in Greece 7 feet isn't as tall as it is here in the U.S.

<< 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 28 >>

September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 << <   > >>
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30      

Search

XML Feeds

multiblog
Ag Radio Network
About Us   Blogs   News   BARN TV   Audio   Calendar   Stations   Contact Us   Home
©2008 AdVance Broadcast and Communication, Ltd. All Rights Reserved