Let me be the first to say (well, not really the first, I suppose) to the University of Nebraska: "Welcome to the Big Ten!!!!"
While I'm confident my enthusiasm for welcoming the Cornhuskers into the dominant league of the Corn Belt is not universal, I am nonetheless well pleased by today's announcement. While little else is known publicly about the shifting conference expansion situation beyond the moves of Nebraska, Colorado, and Boise State this week, we can assume that the drama is far from over.
For my part, I think Nebraska is a tremendous addition to the Big Ten I love so dearly. A legendary athletic program, particularly in the sport of football, is far from the only thing that Nebraska brings to the table. As importantly, I think this is a school that "fits in" with the rest of the league. Beyond mere farm state sensibilities, this is a great Land Grant institution with a respectable academic and research foundation.
From a purely athletic standpoint, who's ready to see Husker Nation and Buckeye Nation go at it in the late season? Count me in, for one. Think Nebraska/Penn State, or Cornhuskers/Spartans won't be fun to watch? Of course they will!
Some good pieces I read on the subject today:
- How did Nebraska get to the Big Ten? From HuskerExtra.com: Big Ten shops for name brand
- People who whine about the money made in college sports drive me nuts. One particularly whiny writer is Mitch Alboom at the Detroit Free Press. In the end, Alboom at least gets it right when discussing why the moaning over money gets under my skin: Once, college sports were a pastime. Today, they pay for the library. And the research center. And the new state-of-the-art stadium. So forget rivalries. Forget driving to the games. This is about networks, packaging, streaming rights -- the kind of stuff discussed at shareholders meetings, not pep rallies.
- Mizzou is now on the outside looking in... Not a great place to be.
- Great point made by a commenter at this story on what happens after Nebraska joins the family: "Would love to see Mizzou still join the Big 10, was also wondering why we haven't targeted Kansas as a possibility. You would think with their basketball background that they'd be a great catch!"
Let's discuss that further for a minute. Football appears to be the largest driving force in the expansion discussion from an athletic standpoint. Money is key to the success of a program, and as I mentioned previously, big money athletic programs build big money academic and research facilities. Look no further than the recently renovated William Oxley Thompson Library here at Ohio State to see what a fiscally stellar athletic department can do for a school off the field.
Given that, it appears that the money to be made watching football and adding a conference title game is far more important that money to be made watching Kansas play Ohio State or the Boilermakers. Those type of marquee matchups can be made in non-conference scheduling, of course, but there are certainly basketball-centric programs that could be worthy of consideration. When was the last time Indiana was a real football dynamo again? Four or five years, at least...
The previous two paragraphs distill why the expansion conversation is about so much more than athletics, money, football, or any other single issue. The decision to welcome a University into what Alboom called a "cartel" is extremely complex, and a potential suitor must have numerous traits to be worthy of inclusion in the Big Ten. Simply having a football dynasty isn't enough, nor is it enough to have an incoming freshman class with an average ACT score of 35.
Like everything else in life, it's all about balance. Balancing academic excellence, athletic excellence, and overall "fit" is why Nebraska is the first team to join the Big Ten in two decades.